Is Turkey an Artificial State, Was Atatürk a British Spy?

Is Turkey an Artificial State, Was Atatürk a British Spy?

The Shadow of the Albion: An Exhaustive Forensic Investigation into the "British Agent" and "Artificial State" Conspiracies Regarding the Founding of the Republic of Turkey

Table of Contents

1. Introduction: The Anatomy of Post-Imperial Trauma

2. 1.1 The Collapse of the Sublime Porte and the Genesis of Suspicion

3. 1.2 The "Sèvres Syndrome" and the Concept of the "Mastermind" (Üst Akıl)

4. 1.3 Methodological Framework: Separating Archival Reality from Revisionist Myth

5. The "British Agent" Hypothesis: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk

6. 2.1 The Theological Roots of the Conspiracy: Islamist Critiques of the Secular Republic

7. 2.2 The Samsun Visa Incident: Bureaucratic Anomaly or Intelligence Clearance?

8. 2.3 The Phantom Meeting: T.E. Lawrence, Mustafa Kemal, and the "Eastward" Strategy

9. 2.4 The "Fake War" Narrative: The Chanak Crisis and the Allegation of Collusion

10. 2.5 The Memoirs of Dr. Rıza Nur: The Foundational Text of the "Traitor" Narrative

11. 2.6 Archival Counter-Evidence: British Intelligence Assessments of the "Kemalist Threat" (1919–1923)

12. The "Artificial State": The Treaty of Lausanne as a Diplomatic "Defeat"

13. 3.1 The "Secret Clauses" Myth: The 2023 Expiration and Resource Prohibition

14. 3.2 The "Nahum Doctrine": Chaim Nahum Effendi and the Alleged Jewish-British Pact

15. 3.3 The Abolition of the Caliphate: British Imperial Necessity or Republican Pragmatism?

16. 3.4 The Mosul Question: The Geopolitics of Oil and the "Barter" for Independence

17. The Kurdish "Setup": Imperial Machinations and the Betrayal Hypothesis

18. 4.1 The "Double Cross": Utilizing Kurdish Nationalism Against the Caliphate

19. 4.2 The Treaty of Sèvres vs. The Treaty of Lausanne: The Legal Erasure of Kurdistan

20. 4.3 The Sheikh Said Rebellion (1925): British Provocation, Turkish Trap, or Indigenous Revolt?

21. 4.4 The "Artificial" Borders: Sykes-Picot and the Fragmentation of the Kurdish Homeland

22. The Ayyubid Legacy and the "Saladin Grudge": The Theological-Historical Dimension

23. 5.1 Saladin Ayyubi in the Western Imagination: The "Crusader" Trauma

24. 5.2 The Islamist-Nationalist Synthesis: Kurds as the "Shield of Islam"

25. 5.3 Analyzing the Claim: Does British Policy Reflect a Historical Vendetta?

26. 5.4 Necip Fazıl Kısakürek and the "Great East" (Büyük Doğu) Interpretation of History

27. Comparative Analysis: The Function of Conspiracy in Turkish Political Identity

28. 6.1 Divergence Points: Where Historical Record and Conspiratorial Narrative Separate

29. 6.2 The Political Utility of the "British Plot" in Contemporary Discourse

30. Conclusion

31. Works Cited

32. Downloadable PDF Version

1. Introduction: The Anatomy of Post-Imperial Trauma

1.1 The Collapse of the Sublime Porte and the Genesis of Suspicion

The dissolution of the Ottoman Empire was not merely a geopolitical restructuring of the Near East; it was a psychological and spiritual cataclysm for the Muslim populations of Anatolia and the wider Islamic world. For six centuries, the Ottoman state had functioned not only as a political entity but as the Devlet-i Ebed-Müddet (The Eternal State), the protector of the Holy Cities of Mecca and Medina, and the seat of the Caliphate. The rapidity of its collapse following World War I, culminating in the occupation of Istanbul by Allied forces in November 1918, engendered a profound sense of disorientation and vulnerability that continues to reverberate through the political consciousness of the region.¹

In the aftermath of the Armistice of Mudros, the territories of the Empire were partitioned among the victorious Entente powers—Britain, France, and Italy—while its internal demographics were shattered by war, displacement, and ethnic conflict. It is within this crucible of humiliation and loss that the modern Turkish propensity for conspiracy theories was forged. The transition from a multi-ethnic, theocratic empire to a secular, unitary nation-state under the leadership of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk was radical and traumatic. For the conservative Muslim segments of society, the abolition of the Sultanate (1922) and the Caliphate (1924), followed by the enforced secularization of public life, was inexplicable as a purely domestic political evolution. It was viewed instead as a continuation of the war by other means—a "cultural occupation" facilitated by internal collaborators.²

The central conspiracy theory that this report investigates posits that the Republic of Turkey is not the result of a heroic war of independence, but rather an "artificial state" created by the British Empire. In this narrative, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is reimagined not as the savior of the nation, but as a British intelligence asset recruited to dismantle Islam from within. Furthermore, this theory integrates the Kurdish question, alleging that the British manipulated Kurdish nationalism to destroy the Ottoman state, only to subsequently "set up" the Kurds for destruction by the new Turkish Republic due to a deep-seated historical grudge stemming from the Crusades and the Ayyubid dynasty.³

Want to read more?

Subscribe to kurdish-history.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe Now