Modern Assyrians Have No Claim to Nineveh: It Belongs to Chaldeans Only!
- Dala Sarkis
- 4 hours ago
- 12 min read
Introduction
In the cradle of civilization, where the Tigris and Euphrates rivers weave through the sands of time, lies the ancient city of Nineveh. Once the capital of the mighty Assyrian Empire, Nineveh stands as a symbol of Mesopotamian glory, a testament to the ingenuity and resilience of its people. But in the modern era, a fierce debate rages over who rightfully claims this heritage: the Chaldeans or the so-called "Assyrians"? As a Chaldean, rooted in the unbroken lineage of ancient Babylon and its successors, I assert without hesitation that Nineveh belongs to the Chaldeans alone. Modern Assyrians, with their fabricated identity, have no legitimate claim.
Their narrative is a patchwork of historical revisionism, colonial meddling, and aggressive assimilation tactics that threaten to erase Chaldean distinctiveness. In this post, we'll delve into the historical discontinuities that undermine Assyrian claims, expose their origins as Nestorian Christians rebranded by British imperialists, and highlight the insidious forces of assimilation they impose on Chaldeans by labeling us as mere "Catholic Assyrians." This is not just about land or ruins—it's about preserving the truth of our ethnic identities.
Nineveh is Chaldean
To understand why Nineveh is inherently Chaldean, we must first revisit the annals of history. The ancient Assyrians, who ruled from Nineveh around 2500 BCE to 612 BCE, were a Semitic people known for their military prowess and architectural marvels. Their empire stretched across Mesopotamia, but it fell spectacularly to a coalition led by the Babylonians—our Chaldean ancestors.
The Chaldeans, emerging as a distinct Aramaic-speaking tribe in southern Mesopotamia, rose to prominence under the Neo-Babylonian Empire (626–539 BCE). Figures like Nabopolassar and his son Nebuchadnezzar II not only conquered Nineveh but integrated its legacy into Babylonian culture. Nineveh's fall in 612 BCE marked the end of Assyrian dominance and the dawn of Chaldean ascendancy. Chaldean kings rebuilt and expanded upon Assyrian foundations, blending traditions into what became the pinnacle of Mesopotamian civilization: the Hanging Gardens, the Ishtar Gate, and the astronomical advancements that influenced the world.
Modern Assyrians Are Not Related to Ancient Assyrians
But what of continuity? Modern Assyrians claim direct descent from these ancient warriors, positioning themselves as the sole heirs to Nineveh. This is a fallacy rooted in romantic nationalism rather than fact. Historical records show a profound break in Assyrian continuity after the empire's collapse. The Assyrian population was scattered, assimilated into conquering empires like the Babylonians, Persians, Medes, and later Greeks and Romans. By the time of the Achaemenid Persians, "Assyria" as an ethnic or cultural entity had dissolved. The people who remained in the region adopted Aramaic as their lingua franca—the language of the Chaldeans—and integrated into broader Mesopotamian societies.
Archaeological evidence from sites like Nimrud and Khorsabad reveals layers of Persian, Hellenistic, and Parthian influences that overwritten Assyrian purity. There is no unbroken chain of Assyrian self-identification through the centuries; instead, we see a mosaic of identities shaped by successive rulers.
Chaldean Continuity
Contrast this with Chaldean continuity. The Chaldeans, often synonymous with the Neo-Babylonians in ancient texts, maintained a distinct identity tied to Ur and Babylon. Even after the Persian conquest, Chaldean priests and scholars preserved Babylonian knowledge in cuneiform tablets, influencing Hellenistic science. The term "Chaldean" evolved but persisted, especially among Aramaic-speaking communities in southern Mesopotamia.
By the early Christian era, Chaldeans were among the first converts, establishing vibrant communities that endured Sassanid, Arab, Mongol, and Ottoman rule. Our language, Sureth (a dialect of Neo-Aramaic), our rituals, and our folklore trace back to Babylonian roots. Nineveh, post-Assyrian fall, became part of this Chaldean sphere—its libraries and artifacts absorbed into Babylonian heritage. To claim Nineveh as Assyrian is to ignore this absorption; it's Chaldean by conquest, culture, and continuity.
Nestorians Became Assyrians
Now, let's address the elephant in the room: the origins of modern "Assyrians." Far from an ancient revival, the Assyrian identity is a 19th-century invention, courtesy of British colonial machinations. The groups now calling themselves Assyrians were historically known as Nestorians—a branch of Eastern Christianity that split from the Byzantine Church in the 5th century over Christological disputes. Nestorians, named after Patriarch Nestorius, flourished in the Persian Empire, spreading to China and India. In Mesopotamia, they were Syriac Christians, speaking Aramaic dialects and maintaining distinct ecclesiastical traditions. They had no collective "Assyrian" label; terms like "Syrian," "Aramean," or "Nestorian" were used interchangeably.
Enter the British Empire in the 1800s. Anglican missionaries, seeking to convert and ally with Eastern Christians amid Ottoman decline, encountered these Nestorian communities in northern Iraq and Persia. Figures like Archbishop Justin Perkins and the Anglican Mission to the Nestorians romanticized these groups as descendants of ancient Assyrians to garner Western support. In 1842, the British began using "Assyrian" as a unifying term, drawing spurious links to the biblical Assyrians to justify intervention. This rebranding culminated in the 1919 Paris Peace Conference, where Nestorian delegates, influenced by British advisors, adopted "Assyrian" to claim nationhood. Historians like Wilfred Alkhas and Joseph Yacoub have documented this: the Nestorian Church officially became the "Assyrian Church of the East" only in 1976, solidifying the rename.
This fabricated identity lacks historical depth. Pre-19th century sources, from Ottoman censuses to traveler accounts like those of Claudius James Rich, refer to these people as "Chaldeans" or "Syrians" without distinction, or specifically as Nestorians. No self-identification as "Assyrian" exists before British influence. It's a colonial construct, much like how Europeans imposed identities on African tribes for administrative ease. Modern Assyrians cling to this myth to assert primacy over shared heritage, but it's smoke and mirrors. Chaldeans, conversely, have used "Chaldean" consistently since antiquity, reinforced by our Catholic union with Rome in 1553, which distinguished us without erasing our roots.
Assyrian Terrorism Against Other Christian Minorities
This brings us to the most pernicious aspect: the forced assimilation imposed by Assyrians on Chaldeans. In a bid to bolster their numbers and legitimacy, Assyrians have systematically attempted to subsume Chaldean identity, branding us as "Catholic Assyrians" or "Chaldean-Assyrians." This is not mere semantics—it's ethnic erasure. Chaldeans are a separate ethnic group, with our own dialects (like Chaldean Neo-Aramaic, distinct from Assyrian variants), customs, and historical narratives.
Our affiliation with the Chaldean Catholic Church, established when Patriarch John Sulaqa united with Rome, emphasizes our Babylonian heritage, not Assyrian. Yet, Assyrian nationalists, through organizations like the Assyrian Universal Alliance, propagate the narrative that all Syriac Christians are Assyrians, differentiated only by denomination: Nestorians as "true" Assyrians, Chaldeans as their Catholic offshoot.
This assimilation manifests in multiple ways. In diaspora communities, particularly in the U.S., Australia, and Europe, Assyrian-led groups pressure Chaldeans to adopt the Assyrian label in censuses and cultural events. For instance, the 2010 U.S. Census saw campaigns urging Chaldeans to mark "Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac," diluting our distinct count. In Iraq, post-2003, Assyrian political parties like the Assyrian Democratic Movement have dominated representation in the Nineveh Plains, marginalizing Chaldean voices despite our majority in areas like Tel Keppe and Alqosh. They advocate for an "Assyrian" autonomous region encompassing Nineveh, ignoring that these lands were Chaldean strongholds under Ottoman millet systems.
Assyrian Terrorists Attempting To Rewrite History
Education and media amplify this. Assyrian websites and publications, such as Assyria Times or the Assyrian International News Agency, routinely refer to Chaldean figures—like the ancient astronomer Kidinnu—as Assyrian, rewriting history. In schools run by Assyrian churches, Chaldean children are taught a unified "Assyrian" history, suppressing Babylonian-Chaldean distinctions. This is cultural imperialism, akin to how dominant groups absorb minorities. Chaldeans face identity crises: young people, bombarded by Assyrian propaganda on social media, question their roots. Platforms like Twitter (now X) and Facebook host debates where Assyrians dismiss Chaldean separatism as "divisive," accusing us of betraying a mythical unity.
The stakes are high for Nineveh. As ISIS ravaged Mosul (modern Nineveh) in 2014, both groups suffered, but reconstruction efforts highlight the divide. Assyrian groups lobby for control, claiming Nineveh as their "heartland," while Chaldeans, through the Babylonian Brigades and church leaders, emphasize our historical conquest and stewardship. International bodies like UNESCO recognize Nineveh's Mesopotamian heritage broadly, but Assyrian lobbying skews narratives. We must resist: Nineveh's gates, palaces, and libraries echo Chaldean victories, not Assyrian revivalism.
Conclusion
In conclusion, modern Assyrians' claim to Nineveh is baseless, built on discontinued history, a Nestorian rebrand by British hands, and aggressive assimilation that threatens Chaldean existence. We Chaldeans are the true custodians—descendants of Babylon's conquerors, preservers of Aramaic wisdom, and resilient survivors. It's time to reclaim our narrative: Nineveh is Chaldean, undivided and eternal. Let us educate, advocate, and unite against erasure. Share this post, fellow Chaldeans, and let's preserve our heritage for generations to come.
Q&A: Addressing Common Questions on Chaldean Heritage and Nineveh
Q1: What is the main difference between Chaldeans and modern Assyrians?
A: Chaldeans trace our roots directly to the ancient Neo-Babylonian Empire, with a continuous ethnic and cultural identity tied to southern Mesopotamia, Aramaic language, and Babylonian traditions. Modern Assyrians, however, are primarily descendants of Nestorian Christian communities who adopted the "Assyrian" label in the 19th century under British influence. We're separate ethnic groups—Chaldeans are not just "Catholic Assyrians," as some claim. Our dialects, customs, and historical narratives differ significantly, with Chaldeans emphasizing Babylonian conquests like the fall of Nineveh.
Q2: You say Assyrians have no historical continuity. Can you explain that further?
A: Absolutely. The ancient Assyrian Empire ended in 612 BCE with the sack of Nineveh by Chaldean-led forces. After that, the Assyrian population was dispersed and assimilated into subsequent empires (Babylonian, Persian, etc.). There's no evidence of a persistent "Assyrian" ethnic identity in historical records until the modern era. In contrast, Chaldeans maintained continuity through priestly traditions, language preservation, and community structures under various rulers. Archaeological and textual evidence, like cuneiform tablets from Babylon, shows Chaldean integration and evolution, not Assyrian survival.
Q3: How did the British rename Nestorians as Assyrians?
A: In the 1800s, British Anglican missionaries, such as Justin Perkins, worked among Nestorian Christians in the Ottoman Empire and Persia. To romanticize these groups and secure Western support against Ottoman rule, they linked them to the biblical Assyrians. This rebranding gained traction in the 20th century, especially after World War I, when Nestorian leaders adopted "Assyrian" for political unity. The Church of the East didn't officially become "Assyrian" until 1976. It's a clear case of colonial identity engineering, not organic revival.
Q4: Why do you call Assyrian efforts 'forced assimilation' on Chaldeans?
A: Assyrian nationalists often label Chaldeans as a subgroup, like "Catholic Assyrians," to inflate their demographic and political claims. This erases our distinct identity. For example, in diaspora censuses, they campaign for combined "Assyrian/Chaldean" categories, diluting Chaldean representation. In Iraq, Assyrian-led parties dominate Nineveh Plains politics, sidelining Chaldean-majority towns. Media and education from Assyrian sources rewrite Chaldean history as Assyrian, pressuring our youth to conform. It's a form of cultural dominance that threatens our unique heritage.
Q5: Isn't Nineveh historically Assyrian? How can Chaldeans claim it?
A: Nineveh was the Assyrian capital, but after its conquest by Chaldeans in 612 BCE, it became part of the Neo-Babylonian Empire. Chaldean kings like Nebuchadnezzar II absorbed and built upon its legacy, making it a shared but Chaldean-dominated Mesopotamian heritage. Modern Assyrians' claims ignore this historical shift and their own lack of continuity. Chaldeans, as conquerors and preservers, have the stronger tie—Nineveh's artifacts and knowledge were integrated into Babylonian (Chaldean) culture.
Q6: What about shared Aramaic language and Christian faith? Doesn't that make us the same people?
A: Shared elements like Neo-Aramaic dialects and Christianity are common among many Middle Eastern groups, but they don't erase ethnic distinctions. Chaldeans and Assyrians have variant dialects (e.g., Chaldean Neo-Aramaic vs. Assyrian), different ecclesiastical traditions (Catholic vs. Church of the East), and unique folklore. It's like saying all Romance-language speakers are the same ethnicity—language and faith are influences, not definers. Our Babylonian roots set us apart from the Nestorian-Assyrian narrative.
Q7: How has this debate affected communities in Iraq today?
A: Post-2003 Iraq and the ISIS attacks on Mosul (Nineveh) in 2014 heightened tensions. Assyrian groups push for an "Assyrian" autonomous region in the Nineveh Plains, often at the expense of Chaldean voices. Chaldeans, through our churches and militias like the Babylonian Brigades, advocate for inclusive governance that recognizes our majority in key areas. International aid and reconstruction efforts sometimes favor Assyrian lobbies, but we're fighting back to ensure Chaldean stewardship of sites like Nineveh's ruins.
Q8: Are there any historians or sources that support your view?
A: Yes, scholars like Wilfred Alkhas in "The Identity of the Assyrian People" and Joseph Yacoub's works on Eastern Christians document the 19th-century origins of modern Assyrianism. Ancient sources, such as the Babylonian Chronicle, detail the Chaldean conquest of Assyria. For continuity, look to Georges Roux's "Ancient Iraq" or studies on Aramaic persistence in Babylonian contexts. These substantiate Chaldean claims over revisionist Assyrian narratives.
Q9: What can Chaldeans do to resist assimilation and preserve our identity?
A: Education is key—teach our youth about Babylonian history through community programs and online resources. Advocate in censuses and politics for separate Chaldean recognition. Support Chaldean media, like the Chaldean News, and engage on platforms like X to counter propaganda. Unity among Chaldeans, without compromising our distinctiveness, will protect our heritage. Join groups like the Chaldean American Chamber of Commerce for diaspora strength.
Q10: Is this post anti-Assyrian, or just pro-Chaldean?
A: It's unapologetically pro-Chaldean, aimed at affirming our identity amid erasure attempts. I respect the struggles of all Syriac Christians, including those identifying as Assyrian, but truth matters. Historical facts show their identity's modern origins and the harm of subsuming Chaldeans. Dialogue is welcome, but not at the cost of our existence as a separate people.
Key Events and Timeline: Chaldean Ascendancy and Assyrian Myth-Making
To provide a clearer historical context for the arguments in my blog post, I've assembled this timeline of key events. It highlights the ancient glory of the Chaldeans, the discontinuities in Assyrian history, the colonial rebranding of Nestorians as "Assyrians," and the ongoing assimilation pressures on Chaldeans. This chronology draws from archaeological records, ancient texts like the Babylonian Chronicle, and scholarly works to underscore Chaldean continuity while exposing the fabricated nature of modern Assyrian claims. Events are grouped by era for readability.
Ancient Mesopotamia: Assyrian Decline and Chaldean Rise
c. 2500 BCE: Emergence of the Old Assyrian period, with Assur as a key city-state. The Assyrian Empire begins its expansion, but this era is marked by cycles of rise and fall, lacking long-term ethnic continuity.
c. 2000–1750 BCE: Old Assyrian Empire flourishes as a trading power, but collapses under invasions, scattering populations and diluting any unified "Assyrian" identity.
c. 1365–1076 BCE: Middle Assyrian Empire under kings like Adad-nirari I and Tiglath-Pileser I establishes control over Mesopotamia, but faces constant rebellions and Aramean incursions, further eroding cultural purity.
934–609 BCE: Neo-Assyrian Empire, the height of ancient Assyrian power under rulers like Ashur-dan II, Sennacherib, and Ashurbanipal. Nineveh becomes the capital, symbolizing Assyrian might, but internal strife and external pressures lead to decline.
626 BCE: Nabopolassar, a Chaldean leader, rebels against Assyrian rule and founds the Neo-Babylonian (Chaldean) Empire. This marks the beginning of Chaldean dominance in southern Mesopotamia.
612 BCE: Fall of Nineveh. A coalition of Chaldeans (under Nabopolassar), Medes, and Babylonians sacks the Assyrian capital, ending the Neo-Assyrian Empire. Chaldean forces absorb Nineveh's territories, integrating its legacy into Babylonian culture. This conquest solidifies Nineveh as Chaldean heritage.
605–562 BCE: Reign of Nebuchadnezzar II, Nabopolassar's son and greatest Chaldean king. He rebuilds Babylon into a wonder of the world (e.g., Hanging Gardens, Ishtar Gate) and conquers Judah (597 BCE), demonstrating Chaldean military and cultural supremacy.
556–539 BCE: Nabonidus, the last Chaldean king, rules amid internal challenges. His focus on religious reforms and archaeology preserves Babylonian knowledge but weakens defenses.
539 BCE: Persian conquest of Babylon by Cyrus the Great ends the Chaldean dynasty. However, Chaldean identity persists through Aramaic language, priestly traditions, and communities under Persian, Greek, and later empires.
Early Christian Era: Distinct Chaldean and Nestorian Paths
1st Century CE: Christianity spreads to Mesopotamia. Chaldeans in southern regions (Babylon area) convert early, maintaining ties to Babylonian roots.
428–431 CE: Nestorius becomes Patriarch of Constantinople; his Christological views lead to condemnation at the Council of Ephesus (431 CE). Followers in the Persian Empire form the Church of the East, later pejoratively called "Nestorian" by Western churches.
5th–6th Centuries CE: The Church of the East declares independence (498 CE) and thrives in Persia, spreading to India, China, and Central Asia. No "Assyrian" self-identification exists; they are known as Syriac or Nestorian Christians.
1552 CE: Schism in the Church of the East. Patriarch John Sulaqa unites with Rome, forming the Chaldean Catholic Church. This distinguishes Chaldeans as Eastern Rite Catholics with Babylonian heritage, separate from the remaining Nestorians.
Modern Era: Colonial Rebranding and Assimilation
19th Century (1800s): British Anglican missionaries, like Justin Perkins, encounter Nestorian communities in northern Iraq and Persia. They romanticize them as "descendants of ancient Assyrians" to justify imperial interests and garner support.
1842 CE: British begin promoting the "Assyrian" label for Nestorians, drawing biblical links. This is the start of the colonial rename, with no prior historical basis for the term among these groups.
1919 CE: Paris Peace Conference. Nestorian delegates, influenced by British advisors, adopt "Assyrian" to claim nationhood and seek autonomy, further entrenching the fabricated identity.
1976 CE: The Church of the East officially renames itself the "Assyrian Church of the East" during a synod under Patriarch Mar Dinkha IV. This solidifies the rebrand but alienates Chaldeans, who are increasingly labeled as "Catholic Assyrians."
2003 CE: U.S. invasion of Iraq destabilizes the region, leading to increased sectarian violence and displacement of both Chaldean and Assyrian communities.
2010 CE: U.S. Census campaigns by Assyrian groups urge Chaldeans to identify as "Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac," diluting Chaldean distinctiveness in diaspora counts.
2014 CE: ISIS occupies Mosul (modern Nineveh), destroying heritage sites and displacing Christians. Both groups suffer, but Assyrian lobbies push for control in reconstruction, marginalizing Chaldean claims to the Nineveh Plains.
Present (2026): Ongoing debates in Iraq and diaspora. Assyrian nationalists dominate Nineveh politics via parties like the Assyrian Democratic Movement, while Chaldeans advocate for separate recognition through churches and militias like the Babylonian Brigades.
This timeline illustrates the clear break in ancient Assyrian continuity after 612 BCE, the Chaldean absorption of their legacy, and the 19th-century invention of modern "Assyrianism." Chaldeans have endured as a distinct people, from Babylonian conquerors to modern advocates. For sources, consult works like Georges Roux's Ancient Iraq, the Babylonian Chronicle, and Joseph Yacoub's studies on Eastern Christians.
Comments