Abdullah Cevdet: The Kurdish Intellectual Who Helped Build the State That Denied Kurdistan (1869–1932)

Sherko Sabir
Mar 4
18 min read

Updated: Mar 4

There is a particular kind of tragedy reserved for those who are too far ahead of their time — and Abdullah Cevdet lived it fully. He signed his most daring political essays with a two-word pen name that said everything: Bir Kürd. A Kurd. In the dying decades of the Ottoman Empire, when Kurdish identity was barely a whisper in the corridors of power, this physician, poet, and revolutionary chose those two words as a declaration of who he was and what he stood for.

He would go on to co-found the most consequential political movement in late Ottoman history. He would spend decades in exile, hunted by sultans and suppressed by censors, writing furiously about science, freedom, and the awakening of his people. He would briefly throw his support behind Kurdish independence in the final convulsions of empire. And then, in one of history's sharpest ironies, he would watch the modern Turkish Republic rise on the very intellectual foundations he had built — only to find himself barred from it, penalised for his Kurdish sympathies and his inconvenient ideas.

Abdullah Cevdet was one of the most brilliant and contradictory minds produced by Kurdish history. His story is not a simple narrative of Kurdish nationalism — it is something more complicated and more human than that. It is the story of a man who contained multitudes: simultaneously a Young Turk and a Kurdish patriot, a materialist and a poet, a moderniser and a man the modern state could not stomach.

Roots in the Kurdish Heartland

Abdullah Cevdet was born on 9 September 1869 in Arapgir, a small town in Malatya in the eastern reaches of Anatolia — deep in the Kurdish highlands, the ancient lands where Kurdish, Armenian, and Turkish communities had lived in uneasy proximity for centuries. His father, Hacı Ömer Vasfi Efendi, was a clerk in the Ottoman military, stationed in Diyarbakır, the great Kurdish city that had served as the cultural and political heart of the region since medieval times.

The family was Kurdish, and Cevdet would carry that identity with him always — even in the years when he described himself as a Turk of Kurdish origin, a formulation that revealed the impossible identity negotiations forced on Kurdish intellectuals of his era. He grew up speaking the languages of the empire, receiving the standard Ottoman religious education, first at local schools in Hozat and Arapgir and later at a military secondary school in Mamüretülaziz (today's Elazığ). His early years were those of a pious, bookish child in a conservative Muslim household.

One small detail from his childhood lodged in his memory and shaped his life. His father, stubborn in his religious convictions, refused the smallpox vaccination on his son's behalf. The disease found Abdullah Cevdet and left its mark on his face for life — pockmarks that stayed with him into adulthood. For a man who would become one of the Ottoman Empire's fiercest advocates of Western science and rational medicine, the irony was profound. His father's rejection of modern medicine had literally marked him. It was his first encounter with what he would spend his life fighting: the resistance of tradition to reason.

The Great Awakening: Istanbul and the Birth of a Radical

Everything changed when Abdullah Cevdet arrived in Istanbul at the age of fifteen to attend the Kuleli Military Medical Preparatory School. The city was an intellectual earthquake. Constantinople at the end of the nineteenth century was a metropolis churning with new ideas — European philosophy, Ottoman reformism, underground politics, forbidden books. For a sharp-minded young man from the Kurdish provinces, it was overwhelming and exhilarating in equal measure.

He continued his studies at the Imperial Military Medical Academy. There, a fellow student, İbrahim Temo, introduced him to Felix Isnard's treatise on materialism. The effect was seismic. The pious Muslim boy from Arapgir began reading voraciously — the German materialists Büchner and Vogt, French positivists, evolutionary biology, Western philosophy. His faith did not simply collapse; it transformed into something stranger and more interesting: a belief that science and reason were the only tools that could save his people, and that religion, though perhaps a useful social force, could not be God in any meaningful sense.

His early poetry shows the collision of worlds happening inside him. He wrote eulogies for the Prophet that dripped with sincerity even as his philosophy moved in the opposite direction. He was becoming what he would later call himself: a materialist mujtahid — someone who sought independent rational judgment in matters that religion had long considered its exclusive territory. It was a dangerous identity in the Ottoman Empire of Sultan Abdul Hamid II, and Cevdet wore it anyway.

"Bir Kürd": A Pen Name as a Political Manifesto

Throughout his career, Abdullah Cevdet wrote under several pen names — but none was more loaded with meaning than Bir Kürd: A Kurd. In a political culture where Kurdish identity was at best invisible and at worst viewed as a problem to be managed by the Ottoman state, signing articles with those two words was an act of defiance and self-assertion.

He used this pen name particularly in his contributions to publications concerned with Kurdish awakening and the East-West divide — including the journal Kurdistan and Roji Kurd (The Kurdish Sun), among the earliest Kurdish-focused publications in Ottoman history. In these pieces, Cevdet wrestled with the question that haunted every Kurdish intellectual of his generation: how could a people who lacked a modern state, a standardised language, and a recognised political identity take their place in the modern world?

His answers were typically those of a nineteenth-century moderniser: through education, through the adoption of European science and rational thought, through the awakening of national consciousness among a people who had for too long been governed by tribal structures and religious authority. He believed — passionately, if sometimes inconsistently — that the Kurds were a people capable of modernity, and that modernity was the only path to survival in the world emerging from the ruins of empire.

This was a radical position. It meant taking on not just the Ottoman state but the Kurdish tribal and religious elites who had their own reasons for preferring the existing order. It meant insisting on a Kurdish identity at a time when the dominant political logic either denied such identities entirely or subsumed them into a vague Ottoman brotherhood.

1889: Co-Founding the Young Turks

In 1889, Abdullah Cevdet was twenty years old, still a student at the Imperial Military Medical Academy, and already deeply involved in underground politics. That year, he and four fellow students — including İbrahim Temo, Mehmed Reşid, İshak Sükûti, and Kerim Sabri — formed a secret society that would grow into one of the most consequential political movements in the history of the modern Middle East.

The group called itself the Committee of Union and Progress — the İttihad ve Terakki Cemiyeti — known to history simply as the Young Turks. Its founding goal was to end the absolutist rule of Sultan Abdul Hamid II, restore the Ottoman constitution, and drag the empire into the modern age. In those early years, the movement had no ethnic agenda. Its founders included Albanians, Arabs, Kurds, and Turks. Abdullah Cevdet, the Kurdish intellectual from Arapgir, was at the very centre of it.

The early years of the movement were terrifying and electric. Members were arrested, exiled, interrogated, and killed. Cevdet himself was arrested and exiled to Tripolitania (today's Libya) as a military physician — a punitive posting designed to remove him from the political scene. He was imprisoned in a castle there for four months. When he learned that a further exile to the desolate Fezzan region was being planned, he fled.

He made his way through Tunisia and eventually reached Europe in 1897 — the beginning of a long exile that would take him to Geneva, Vienna, Paris, and Cairo. It was in exile that Abdullah Cevdet came fully into his own.

Exile and the Kurdish Voice: Writing from the Margins

In Geneva, Cevdet threw himself into the work of the Young Turk exile community with furious energy. He co-edited the newspaper Osmanlı (The Ottoman) with İshak Sükûti and Tunalı Hilmi, one of the primary organs of the opposition movement. He translated German materialist philosophy into Ottoman Turkish, making Büchner's Kraft und Stoff (Force and Matter) available to Ottoman readers for the first time. He wrote poetry that French Symbolist writers praised as genuinely remarkable, and met Theodor Herzl, whose letter he helped translate into Turkish.

But alongside all this cosmopolitan intellectual activity, Cevdet was also writing about the Kurds. In pieces published under the Bir Kürd pen name, he addressed the Kurdish question directly — arguing for Kurdish cultural and political awakening, and insisting that the Kurds had both the right and the capacity to participate in modernity on their own terms.

In 1904, in Geneva, Cevdet founded the journal İctihad — a name carrying enormous significance in Islamic intellectual tradition, referring to the practice of independent juristic reasoning. The name was deliberate and provocative: Cevdet was claiming for secular rational thought the same authority that religious scholars had long claimed for divine law. İctihad would survive, under various aliases and through numerous bans and legal crises, until Cevdet's death in 1932 — nearly thirty years of continuous publication.

The Break with Turkish Nationalism

The year 1902 was a turning point. The Committee of Union and Progress was fracturing along ideological lines. One faction, increasingly influential, was pushing the organisation toward a programme built on Turkish ethnic nationalism — Türkçülük. For Cevdet, a Kurdish intellectual who had never understood the movement in ethnic terms, this was a fundamental betrayal.

He broke with the CUP. The organisation he had helped create at the age of twenty was now pursuing an ideology he found anathema. Turkish nationalism, in Cevdet's view, was not modernisation — it was the substitution of one form of tribal identity for another. It would, he believed, ultimately destroy the Ottoman political community rather than save it. He would be proved right, though the rightness of his prediction brought him no comfort.

After the CUP's Young Turk Revolution of 1908 succeeded — briefly restoring the constitution and sending Abdul Hamid II into exile — Cevdet returned to Istanbul in 1910. He had founded the Democratic Party in 1908 as an alternative to the CUP. He was a political outsider in the new order, respected intellectually but marginalised politically.

İctihad and the Battle for the Ottoman Mind

Sidelined from direct politics, Abdullah Cevdet poured his energy into İctihad. The journal became the flagship publication of the Ottoman Westernist movement — a loose coalition of intellectuals committed to the thoroughgoing modernisation of society on European models. Under Cevdet's editorship, İctihad published translations of European scientific texts, argued for women's rights and workers' rights, advocated for secularism and freedom of thought, and consistently challenged the religious establishment's grip on education and public life.

Cevdet's proposals were breathtakingly radical for the time. He called for the adoption of the Latin alphabet — an idea rejected in 1912 but implemented by Atatürk in 1928. He argued for the complete separation of religion and state. He advocated for full legal equality for women. He translated and promoted Gustave Le Bon's theories of elite governance, which later influenced Kemalist political thought.

The religious establishment loathed him. He was tried repeatedly for blasphemy. His most famous court case came in 1922, when he published an article defending the Bahá'í Faith and was convicted of insulting Islam. His enemies called him Aduvullah — the Enemy of God. He wore the epithet with something approaching pride.

A Brief Flame: Kurdish Independence and the Ruins of Empire

The years after the First World War — which Cevdet had opposed, correctly predicting catastrophe for the empire — brought a brief, agonising window of possibility for Kurdish political aspirations. The Ottoman defeat and the Allied occupation of Istanbul created a moment in which everything seemed, briefly, possible. The Treaty of Sèvres in 1920 appeared to open the door to an autonomous or independent Kurdistan. Kurdish political organisations multiplied.

Abdullah Cevdet stepped into this moment. Between 1921 and 1922, he was active in the Society for the Rise of Kurdistan (Kürdistan Teali Cemiyeti), one of the principal Kurdish political organisations of the period. For the first time in his career, he moved beyond writing about Kurdish awakening to active involvement in organisations explicitly dedicated to Kurdish political independence.

It was also a period of genuine confusion and competing loyalties. Cevdet was simultaneously involved with the Friends of England Society, which advocated for a British mandate over Turkey — a position that looked pragmatic to him and treasonous to Turkish nationalists. His politics in these years were characterised by a desperate attempt to find any framework that might allow the peoples of the former empire — Kurds included — to survive with their identities and rights intact.

The window closed as quickly as it had opened. Mustafa Kemal's Turkish nationalist movement outmanoeuvred both the Allies and the Kurdish political organisations. The Treaty of Lausanne in 1923 replaced Sèvres, and with it went any possibility of a Kurdish autonomous region. Cevdet, a realist, immediately threw his support behind Ankara.

The Bitter Harvest: Punished by the Republic He Helped Create

The new Turkish Republic had, in a very real sense, been built on Abdullah Cevdet's ideas. The secularism, the Latin alphabet reform, the emphasis on Western science and rational governance, the dismantling of religious institutions — these were precisely the programme Cevdet had been advocating in İctihad for thirty years. Mustafa Kemal is said to have met with Cevdet for a four-hour session in Ankara, telling the ageing doctor that he had tried to apply his thoughts.

And yet Abdullah Cevdet was banned from state service for life.

The reasons were his past: his pro-British stance during the occupation years, and above all his involvement in Kurdish nationalist organisations. In 1924, Mustafa Kemal is said to have considered offering him a seat in parliament, but the press campaigned against him and the appointment never materialised. The man who had spent decades arguing for the modernisation programme the Republic was now implementing was kept at arm's length — too Kurdish, too complicated, too much of a reminder that the modern Turkey being built was not the only possible future that had been imagined.

He spent his final years as he had spent much of his life: writing, translating, and publishing İctihad. He translated the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam into Turkish. He watched the republic he had in some measure intellectually fathered implement his ideas while erasing his name.

Death Without Mourners, and the Strange Mercy of a Writer

Abdullah Cevdet died of a heart attack in Istanbul on 29 November 1932, at the age of sixty-three. He had been increasingly isolated in his final years — the great controversialist whose enemies had outlasted his influence, the ageing radical in a republic that had moved on.

His body was brought to Hagia Sophia — still a mosque at that time — for the funeral prayer. And there it sat, unclaimed. Nobody came forward to claim his coffin. Religious conservatives, who had hated him for decades, declared that he did not deserve an Islamic burial. The man who had written thousands of pages on the relationship between Islam, reason, and modernity lay in his coffin while the question of whether he deserved to be prayed over was debated in the streets of Istanbul.

In the end, it was a writer who saved him. Peyami Safa, a prominent Turkish novelist, made a public appeal for the funeral prayer to be performed. It was. Municipal workers then carried Abdullah Cevdet's body to the Merkezefendi Cemetery, where he was buried. His personal library and archive were preserved by his daughter Gül Karlıdağ, and the rare books and furniture from the İctihad House in Cağaloğlu — where he had worked and written for so many years — still stand today.

Legacy: The Kurd the Republic Forgot

Abdullah Cevdet defies easy categorisation, which is precisely why he is so important. He was a Kurdish intellectual who helped found the movement that created modern Turkey. He was a secularist who never stopped grappling with the spiritual dimensions of existence. He was a nationalist — a Kurdish nationalist — who spent most of his career working within Ottoman and then Turkish political frameworks. He was a Westerniser who never stopped writing in the literary traditions of the East, translating Persian poetry and drawing on Islamic philosophical categories even as he dismantled Islamic authority.

His Kurdish identity was never incidental to who he was. It shaped his politics, his sense of the world's injustices, his understanding of what modernity might mean for a people without a state. The pen name Bir Kürd was not a costume he wore occasionally — it was a claim he made about himself at a time when making that claim carried real costs.

He was also a man of his time in ways that can be uncomfortable — his flirtation with eugenics, his political inconsistencies, his pro-British phase, his eventual accommodation with a Turkish nationalism he had once opposed. He was not a hero in any clean sense. He was something more interesting than that: a human being of extraordinary intelligence navigating an extraordinary historical moment, making compromises and taking risks.

For Kurdish history specifically, Abdullah Cevdet holds a unique place. He was among the first Kurdish intellectuals to articulate, in print and in public, the idea that the Kurds were a people with a distinct identity, a legitimate place in the modern world, and the right to shape their own future. He signed two words that meant everything: Bir Kürd. A Kurd. In the end, that signature was the most honest thing he ever wrote.

Key Events Timeline

1869 — Born 9 September in Arapgir, Malatya, to a Kurdish family. Father serves as an Ottoman military clerk.
1885 — Graduates from Military Junior High School in Mamüretülaziz (Elazığ).
c.1884 — Moves to Istanbul at age fifteen to attend the Kuleli Military Medical Preparatory School; intellectual transformation begins.
1889 — Co-founds the Committee of Union and Progress (Young Turks) with four medical school colleagues in Istanbul.
1894 — Graduates as an ophthalmologist. Arrested for political activities; exiled to Tripolitania (Libya) and imprisoned.
1897 — Flees to Europe via Tunisia; arrives in Geneva and joins the Young Turk exile community. Co-edits the newspaper Osmanlı.
1902 — Breaks with the CUP over its embrace of Turkish nationalism; writes under the Bir Kürd pen name for Kurdish-focused publications.
1904 — Founds the journal İctihad in Geneva — his intellectual flagship for the next 28 years.
1908 — Young Turk Revolution restores the Ottoman constitution. Cevdet founds the Democratic Party as an alternative to the CUP.
1910 — Returns to Istanbul after years of exile; relocates İctihad to the capital.
1912 — Proposes adoption of the Latin alphabet for Turkish writing — rejected at the time, adopted by Atatürk in 1928.
1914–1918 — Opposes Ottoman entry into World War I; suspends İctihad under wartime censorship.
1920–1922 — Actively involved in Kurdish independence through the Society for the Rise of Kurdistan and the Friends of England Society.
1922 — Convicted of blasphemy for defending the Bahá'í Faith in İctihad; two-year sentence ultimately not served.
1923 — Treaty of Lausanne replaces Sèvres; Kurdish autonomy abandoned. Cevdet supports Mustafa Kemal's Turkish National Movement.
1924 — Banned from state service for life; prevented from taking a seat in parliament due to his Kurdish nationalist past.
1928 — Atatürk implements the Latin alphabet reform — a key İctihad proposal Cevdet had advanced sixteen years earlier.
1932 — Dies of a heart attack on 29 November in Istanbul, aged 63. Buried at Merkezefendi Cemetery after a disputed funeral at Hagia Sophia.

Questions & Answers About Abdullah Cevdet

Q1: Who was Abdullah Cevdet?

Abdullah Cevdet (1869–1932) was a Kurdish-born Ottoman physician, poet, intellectual, and political activist. He co-founded the Committee of Union and Progress (the Young Turks) in 1889, published the influential modernist journal İctihad for nearly three decades, and was one of the earliest voices to articulate Kurdish political and cultural identity in print. He is considered a foundational figure in both the Ottoman Westernist intellectual tradition and the early Kurdish nationalist movement.

Q2: What does "Bir Kürd" mean and why did Cevdet use it as a pen name?

"Bir Kürd" means "A Kurd" in Turkish and Ottoman. Cevdet used this pen name for articles dealing with Kurdish identity, the East-West divide, and Kurdish awakening — published in outlets including Kurdistan and Roji Kurd. In a political environment where Kurdish identity was marginalised or erased, signing his name as "A Kurd" was a deliberate act of self-assertion and political defiance. It declared that the author had a distinct ethnic identity and was unafraid to claim it publicly.

Q3: What was the Committee of Union and Progress and what role did Cevdet play in founding it?

The CUP — the Young Turks — was a secret political organisation founded in 1889 by five medical school students in Istanbul with the goal of ending Sultan Abdul Hamid II's absolute rule and restoring the Ottoman constitution. Cevdet was one of its five founding members. Though initially non-ethnic in character, the CUP eventually embraced Turkish nationalism — a direction Cevdet strongly opposed, leading to his break from the organisation in 1902.

Q4: What was İctihad and why was it significant?

İctihad was a journal Cevdet founded in Geneva in 1904. Over nearly three decades, through bans, name changes, and legal crises, it served as the flagship of Ottoman Westernism — advocating for secularism, women's rights, workers' rights, science-based governance, and the Latin alphabet. Its ideas directly influenced the Kemalist reforms of the 1920s and 1930s, making it one of the most consequential publications in late Ottoman intellectual history.

Q5: Why did Abdullah Cevdet break with the Young Turks?

Cevdet broke with the CUP in 1902 because the organisation was increasingly embracing Turkish ethnic nationalism. For Cevdet — a Kurdish intellectual who had always understood the movement in multi-ethnic Ottomanist terms — this was a fundamental ideological betrayal. He believed that Turkish nationalism would fracture the empire rather than save it, and that it offered nothing to the Kurds, Armenians, Arabs, and other non-Turkish peoples of the empire.

Q6: What role did Cevdet play in the Kurdish independence movement?

Between 1921 and 1922, during the window of opportunity opened by the Ottoman defeat in World War I and the Allied occupation of Istanbul, Cevdet was actively involved with the Society for the Rise of Kurdistan (Kürdistan Teali Cemiyeti). This was his most direct engagement with organised Kurdish political independence. He also supported a British mandate over Turkey during this period — a position that would later be used against him by the Republican authorities.

Q7: Why was Cevdet barred from the Turkish Republic despite his intellectual contributions?

The Republic barred Cevdet from state service for life due to two principal reasons: his pro-British stance during the Allied occupation of Istanbul, and his active participation in Kurdish nationalist organisations. The irony was profound — many of the Republic's founding reforms had been advocated by Cevdet in İctihad for decades before they became state policy, yet his Kurdish identity and associations made him politically untouchable.

Q8: What happened at Cevdet's funeral?

Cevdet died on 29 November 1932 and his body was brought to Hagia Sophia (then still a mosque) for the funeral prayer. No one came forward to claim his coffin. Religious conservatives declared he did not deserve an Islamic burial because of his alleged atheism and history of blasphemy charges. It was the novelist Peyami Safa who made a public appeal, prompting the funeral prayer to finally be performed. Municipal workers then buried him at the Merkezefendi Cemetery.

Q9: What were some of Cevdet's most controversial ideas?

Cevdet was one of the most provocative intellects of his era. He argued for the complete separation of religion and state, the adoption of the Latin alphabet (decades before it happened), and full legal equality for women. He published controversial translations of European materialist philosophy that directly challenged Islamic orthodoxy. In 1922, he controversially defended the Bahá'í Faith in İctihad, leading to a blasphemy conviction. His detractors called him Aduvullah — the Enemy of God, and the eternal enemy of Islam.

Q10: What is Abdullah Cevdet's legacy for Kurdish history?

For Kurdish history, Cevdet holds a unique place as one of the first intellectuals to articulate, in print and in public, the idea of the Kurds as a distinct people with a modern political identity and the right to self-determination. Writing as "Bir Kürd" at a time when such ideas were dangerous, he helped lay the intellectual groundwork for twentieth-century Kurdish nationalism. He also demonstrated the impossible position of Kurdish intellectuals within the Ottoman and Turkish systems — indispensable to the modernisation project, yet ultimately excluded from its fruits.

Conclusion

Abdullah Cevdet's life was a mirror held up to the contradictions of his era — and those contradictions have not gone away. The Kurdish people are still navigating the same fundamental tension he lived: how to preserve and assert a distinct identity within political frameworks that were never designed to accommodate it. The states that emerged from the Ottoman collapse — Turkey, Iraq, Syria, Iran — all found ways to marginalise and suppress the Kurdish political claims that Cevdet had articulated with such clarity and courage.

There is something both inspiring and heartbreaking about Cevdet's story. Inspiring because he refused to be invisible — he put "A Kurd" on his writing when it was dangerous to do so, he argued for his people's place in the modern world, and he bent the arc of history in ways that shaped the region for a century. Heartbreaking because so much of what he hoped for — a Kurdistan, or at least a Kurdistan's worth of dignity — never came. The republic that built itself on his ideas found it convenient to forget his name.

He deserves to be remembered. Not just as a footnote in the history of the Young Turks, not just as a colourful Ottoman eccentric, but as what he actually was: a Kurdish intellectual of the first order, a man who fought with his pen for a people who had not yet found their collective voice, and who left behind a body of work that speaks — still — to the question of what it means to be Kurdish in a world that would rather you were something else.

References

Wikipedia. "Abdullah Cevdet." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_Cevdet
Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü. Bir Siyasal Düşünür Olarak Doktor Abdullah Cevdet ve Dönemi. Istanbul: Üçdal Neşriyat, 1981.
Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü. "Blueprints for a Future Society: Ottoman Materialists on Science, Religion, and Art." In Late Ottoman Society: The Ottoman Legacy, edited by Elizabeth Özdalga. London: Routledge, 2001, pp. 28–116.
Mardin, Şerif. Jön Türklerin Siyasi Fikirleri: 1895–1908. Ankara: Türkiye İş Bankası, 1964.
Ülken, Hilmi Ziya. Çağdaş Türk Düşüncesi Tarihi. Ankara, 1966, pp. 387–405.
Oxford Islamic Studies Online. "Cevdet, Abdullah." Oxford University Press, 2007–2008. http://oxfordislamicstudies.com/print/opr/t236/e1001
Daily Sabah. "Abdullah Cevdet: Eccentric, Strange and Misunderstood." 7 June 2019. https://www.dailysabah.com/portrait/2019/06/07/abdullah-cevdet-eccentric-strange-and-misunderstood
T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. "Abdullah Cevdet." Republic of Turkey Ministry of Culture and Tourism. https://www.ktb.gov.tr/EN-118046/abdullah-cevdet.html
Zürcher, Erik Jan. Turkey: A Modern History. Third edition. London: I.B. Tauris, 2004.
Grokipedia. "Abdullah Cevdet." https://grokipedia.com/page/Abdullah_Cevdet
Biyografya. "Abdullah Cevdet." https://www.biyografya.com/en/biographies/abdullah-cevdet-856d89e5
Kieser, Hans-Lukas. Talaat Pasha: Father of Modern Turkey, Architect of Genocide. Princeton University Press, 2018.
Jwaideh, Wadie. The Kurdish National Movement: Its Origins and Development. Syracuse University Press, 2006.
Kurds.ir. "Abdullah Cevdet." https://kurdsir.site123.me/kurd-charisma/abdullah-cevdet